wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Updated: Airtel Files Petition In Delhi High Court Over DoT Order On 3G ICR Roaming

Update: The Delhi High Court has granted a stay on the DoT order that asked telcos to stop 3G ICR arrangements, reports The Economic Times. The court asked Airtel to reply to the show cause notice issued by DoT, within 60 days and has sought details related to the revenue and customers that it gained from the ICR arrangements and about the TDSAT case.

Earlier: Following the Department of Telecom’s order directing Bharti Airtel, Vodafone and Idea Cellular, to stop 3G intra- circle roaming agreements, Bharti Airtel has reportedly moved the Delhi High Court challenging the DoT notice, reports PTI (via Zee News).

According to the report, Bharti Airtel has said that the DoT order is against public interest as it adversely affected the interest of the customers and subscribers who benefit from the 3G arrangements, and that it violates Article 14 (equality before law) ‘as it is arbitrary, has no rational basis, is illogical and contrary to the contract between the parties’

“TDSAT passed split verdict and resultantly the matter is pending before the court and it has not been disposed of. Thus the interim order passed by TDSAT and confirmed by this court (the Delhi High Court in February 2012) continues to remain in force and the DoT cannot take any step to restrain the petitioner from acting upon the 3G ICR arrangements,” said Airtel in its petition.

Airtel’s plea also mentions that it had successfully bid during the 3G spectrum auction and made significant investments, and the DoT order violates Airtel’s rights under ‘Article 19 (1)(g) of the Indian Constitution’, and that the DoT had taken the decision in haste. The petition also cites the split verdict of the TDSAT, saying that the interim decision was still valid as the matter was still pending in TDSAT.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

In August, the Law Ministry had given its nod to the Department of Telecom for taking action against telcos that have been offering 3G services in service areas where they were not allotted 3G spectrum via Intra-circle roaming agreements. Additional Solicitor General’s in his response to a DoT query, had said that the DoT had the right to claim the revenue earned by companies who did not have ‘any authorisation, permission or license from the DoT’ to run 3G services based on’the doctrine of unjust enrichment’, and that DoT also had the mandate to cancel their permits.

Telecom operators, Vodafone, Idea Cellular and Airtel use 3G Intra-circle roaming pacts to offer 3G services in areas where they don’t have a 3G license. The DoT and the operators have been at loggerheads on the issue, with the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) delivering a split-verdict on the dispute, in July, as the two-member judge bench comprising of the chairman Justice S B Sinha and member P K Rastogi, reached different conclusions on whether these pacts could be allowed or not. While Sinha approved the telecom operators’ appeal against DoT’s directive to stop intra-circle 3G roaming stating that DoT had not followed proper process and had not provided appropriate time for telcos to respond with their views, asking DoT to restart this process and provide enough time for operators to respond to DoT’s directive,  Rastogi had dismissed the telcos’ appeal stating that operators cannot offer 3G services in the country when they only have 2G licenses.

Do read our take on the 3G Intra-Circle Roaming dispute.

– Aircel & Tata Docomo Cancel 3G Intra Circle Roaming Agreement: Report
– 3G Roaming Scam Or Just Poorly Thought Out Policy?
– Idea Cellular Q2FY12 Call: To Launch Branded Android OS Phones; 3G ICR Revenues; MNP

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Written By

MediaNama’s mission is to help build a digital ecosystem which is open, fair, global and competitive.



The Delhi High Court should quash the government's order to block Tanul Thakur's website in light of the Shreya Singhal verdict by the Supreme...


Releasing the policy is akin to putting the proverbial 'cart before the horse'.


The industry's growth is being weighed down by taxation and legal uncertainty.


Due to the scale of regulatory and technical challenges, transparency reporting under the IT Rules has gotten off to a rocky start.


Here are possible reasons why Indians are not generating significant IAP revenues despite our download share crossing 30%.

You May Also Like


Google has released a Google Travel Trends Report which states that branded budget hotel search queries grew 179% year over year (YOY) in India, in...


135 job openings in over 60 companies are listed at our free Digital and Mobile Job Board: If you’re looking for a job, or...


Rajesh Kumar* doesn’t have many enemies in life. But, Uber, for which he drives a cab everyday, is starting to look like one, he...


By Aroon Deep and Aditya Chunduru You’re reading it here first: Twitter has complied with government requests to censor 52 tweets that mostly criticised...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

© 2008-2021 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ