wordpress blog stats
Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Updated: Public Listing Of Comments On India’s Internet Control Rules

Update: We’ve updated the list of comments below with scans of responses from Google, Yahoo, IAMAI, CII, DSCI, MAIT and USIBC. We received these documents in response to an Right To Information request filed with the DIT.

This public listing of comments is is now complete.

May 13th 2011:India’s Department of Information Technology (DIT) had, earlier this year, sought comments from Industry bodies and people on draft rules related Section 79 of the IT Act, which in their draft and finalized versions allow the Indian government to control content on the Internet; effectively, India’s Internet Control Rules.

The DIT was expected – much like the TRAI does with consultations – to create a public listing of comments submitted. From what we’ve seen on their website, they haven’t. The DIT has stated in a press release that “None of the Industry Associations and other stakeholders objected to the formulation which is now being cited in some section of media”, which is not true. More on that here. We’re creating (below) a own public listing of comments submitted to the DIT on these rules, so if you’ve sent your comments/recommendations to the DIT, please do share a copy with us. See for yourself if there have been any objections to the draft rules, which is fairly similar to the final ones:

Comments Received/Published (Zip files contain scans)

*Note: CIS informs us that they had submitted their comments to the DIT, but we didn’t get a copy of their filing from the DIT. It appears that for some unexplained reason, their comments were not taken on board. We’re including them here, nevertheless, for your reference

– Declined To Share: IAMAI
– No response (to our mail): from ASSOCHAM, Bharti Airtel, FICCI, Google India, Nokia India, Yahoo India, Times Internet Ltd

Other Responses

– eBay India and Rediff.com say that they submitted their comments to the IAMAI, not the DIT. The IAMAI has declined to share its comments.

Note: these are comments that have been submitted for the Draft rules, and there is no consultation on the final rules. MediaNama’s view on this is that there needs to be further consultation, given the issues with the final rules. Many of the objections raised with respect to the draft rules have not been incorporated in the final rules.

Secondly, we’re filing an RTI request for copies of comments submitted, so might as well save us the waiting and send us a copy.

Update 1: We’ve filed a Right To Information request today with the Department of Information Technology, at the Kashmere Gate GPO in Delhi. Our filing here. Download a sample RTI form here, change the details in the highlighted portion, and file it at any General Post Office (view a list). Will cost you only Rs. 10, plus Rs. 2 per page if you’re sent lots of documents.

You May Also Like


From January 15, all landline phones dialling mobile numbers will need to prefix “0” first, the Department of Telecommunications ordered on November 20 and...


The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) will put out a policy soon for the proliferation of public WiFi hotspots, a senior official said. “In the...


Airtel has recommended against redefining broadband from 512Kbps, arguing that this speed is enough for most broadband use in the country. “Throughput speed of...


Three Indians have been appointed as members to the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) for 2021 of the United Nations'(UN) Internet Governance Forum (IGF). The...

MediaNama is the premier source of information and analysis on Technology Policy in India. More about MediaNama, and contact information, here.

© 2008-2018 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ

Subscribe to Daily Newsletter

    © 2008-2018 Mixed Bag Media Pvt. Ltd. Developed By PixelVJ