Comments on: One97 Communications Launches Payment Platform PayTM

By: Mukesh

Mukesh — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:55:12 +0000

Guys stop looking to download this application. PayTM is not a product which will directly interact with down line customers but this is a product for enterprise companies and telecom operators to use One97 PayTM payment gateway for their services.

By: Abhishek

Abhishek — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:41:47 +0000

For PayTM product features and service offerings, please visit www.paytm.in

By: TUSHAR SHARMA

TUSHAR SHARMA — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:01:11 +0000

MIght be soon other VAS players too get in the race of entring mobile-Commerce but still as indian market is concerned it wll take time for the subscribers getting use to it.

By: Thirdeye

Thirdeye — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:08:18 +0000

V.Shekhar and R Madhok share more than just the history of working together when Madhok was in Airtel. He has benefited among others Onmobile with sugared contract terms. Hope he turns this initiative into a success using his charms. All the best. One 97 has a poor reputation as a company. It uses all strenghts including money.

By: Jatin

Jatin — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:22:45 +0000

Guys I checked out their download page. They are for now just only into wallpapers and have no downloadable application or WAP/SMS based service for m-commerce.

I am closely following the mobile commerce space and have tried most of the m-commerce applications present in the Indian market. As of today only ngpay and mcheck are worth mentioning. No existing m-commerce application/service, available in the market, beats mcheck when it comes to transacting with Airtel. But I would give ngpay the highest rating for its shop front which is simplistic and yet powerful and have almost 100 merchants on board.

This is a growing market and as per various marketing strategies they might have started their PR much ahead of their application release. Anyway I will be tracking them and hope they live up to their PR.

By: Nikhil Pahwa

Nikhil Pahwa — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:15:43 +0000

Ok. There was an instance of name-calling, so had to remove that. If you mail/respond with your email address, I can send you a copy of the comment, with the portion highlighted.

You're right – we should have tried out a demo and posted screencaps.

By: Ravi

Ravi — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:51:35 +0000

Sure, I accept your response. However, I don't think there was any defamatory terms in my comment. The point was that it would be better to have product/service information available for readers to review before you put them on a site as reputable as yours.

By: Nikhil Pahwa

Nikhil Pahwa — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:30:46 +0000

Vikas & Ravi: you're right that there's no detail of the product on the website, but the company is expected to go live with it soon, as has been mentioned in the story.

Ravi: would suggest that you refrain from using any potentially defamatory terms when referring to the company in question, or any company that we cover, for that matter. Had to moderate your comment.

By: Vikas

Vikas — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:10:17 +0000

Where is the product?