Dual-SIM Handsets Standoff: Vendors Take On Patent Owner Who Seeks Rs 35 Royalty Per Phone


In a landmark development, eight phone importers including Samsung India Electronics and Spice Mobile have united against the patent owner of dual SIM handsets.

Dual SIM Mobiles

Dual SIM phones are those that have two SIM card slots, allowing users to use multiple connections simultaneously on the same device. Dual mode phones, on the other hand, let you access two technologically different networks – GSM and CDMA. Both use the same principle of incorporating 2 SIM card holders in a handset. According to Business Standard, an estimated 100,000 dual-SIM phones are sold every month in India.

The Inventor

Somasundaram Ramkumar from Madurai had filed a patent for dual SIM card mobile phones in 2002 at the Indian patent office and was awarded the patent last year. His patent application can be viewed here. He had approached the Office of the Commissioner of Customs of Chennai Airport to stop clearing shipments of the phones until he receives his royalty fees.

Royalty

Patent owners are to receive a mutually agreed upon payment for use of their ideas in a commercial product, which is called a royalty fee. In India, the concept of acknowledging ownership and copyrights is still rising and patent awareness is poor, even amongst corporates. To give a sense of the amount, royalty fees on computers and consumer electronics is 2% of the MRP, but in the telecom sector, royalty fees range from 2-10%, according to Wikipedia. In this case, Ramkumar is said to have asked for Rs 35 per phone shipped into the country, which we think is quite reasonable.

Samsung’s Petition Withdrawn

Samsung India Electronics had filed a petition challenging the impounding of its stocks of dual SIM phones by Indian customs authorities in Mumbai, but the Delhi High Court dismissed it. The vendor is planning to take it up with the Mumbai High Court now, according to Financial Chronicle. The industry body Indian Cellular Association has been roped in to take it up with the customs authority even as other handset vendors watch and wait to see what happens. Spice Mobile offers four dual SIM handsets – D-80, D-88, D-90 and PDA phone D-1100. Samsung‘s Duo phone was recently launched as a dual mode phone in the touch screen mobile segment and its . Fly (Meridian Mobile) and Motorola have also launched dual SIM mobiles.

Meanwhile, the Madras High Court has directed retailers and even online shopping sites such as Rediff and Ebay to stop selling dual SIM phones, which have been quite popular in the country. Backed by the clout of the courts, Ramkumar has a good chance of winning this war against alleged IP theft.

(Update: changed to indicate that IP theft is alleged)

Popularity: 3% [?]

  • Sunil M

    Quanta Computer from Taiwan owns patent on "Dual SIM (subscriber indentity module) card connector" (US patent#6623305) which was issued in 2003. They must also be eligible for royalty. Since this was issued before Somasundaram, it will be interesting to see how it goes.

  • anon

    Ip theft is a pretty strong term to be using….With little background on this self-proclaimed "inventor" that appears to have a history of inventions (with all due respect!), I guess a little scepticism might not be out of place…..As for the Rs.35/- royalty fee, any idea on how that has been arrived at?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/NikhilPahwa Nikhil Pahwa

    Sunil – depends on the specific invention, right? There could be a difference between the dual SIM that Quanta has, and the one that Somasundaram has a patent for.

    Anon: you're right. we're updating accordingly. But it also does bring to light the issue of patent trolling, and the need to track and protect IP.

  • Sunil M.

    Nikhil – I did read both the patents. I am not well-versed with Patent laws in India. But based on my patent knowledge in US, the one from Quanta can act as prior art for Somasundaram's. I would like to quote Section 35 U.S.C 103(a) from USPTO MPEP (Manual of Patent Examining Procedure):

    "A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made."

  • Sunil M.

    Anon- Qualcomm has a royalty structure which is slightly below 5% of the device price. This can give you an idea as to how Rs. 35/- been arrived.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/VasGuyIndia VasGuyIndia

    Great post. I don't think anyone in India understood what you said. But "SmartBoy" definitely bola hoga.