<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airtel To Moderate User Broadband Speeds; What Of Net Neutrality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/</link>
	<description>Telecom, Digital Media, Applications, Services, Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:59:43 +0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harsha J</title>
		<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-4411</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsha J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medianama.com/?p=2339#comment-4411</guid>
		<description>Gopal is absolutely correct. All Indian telecom operator cheat customer with poor service and quality. In true sense 256 kbps cannot be called as broadband.They don&#039;t have right to speak about international standard. Even if you are ready to pay more then also they dont assure a good speed. They are reluctant to invest on technology which helps customer.. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gopal is absolutely correct. All Indian telecom operator cheat customer with poor service and quality. In true sense 256 kbps cannot be called as broadband.They don&#039;t have right to speak about international standard. Even if you are ready to pay more then also they dont assure a good speed. They are reluctant to invest on technology which helps customer..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagesh</title>
		<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-4377</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medianama.com/?p=2339#comment-4377</guid>
		<description>And that they can make room for more by suppressing the usage of a few? Do you have any idea how limited our bandwidth infrasructure is?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that they can make room for more by suppressing the usage of a few? Do you have any idea how limited our bandwidth infrasructure is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajiv</title>
		<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-4376</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medianama.com/?p=2339#comment-4376</guid>
		<description>How do you assume that limited bandwidth is the issue here?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you assume that limited bandwidth is the issue here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaurav</title>
		<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-4368</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaurav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medianama.com/?p=2339#comment-4368</guid>
		<description>they will still have a large set of users. Don&#039;t think this move will effect more than may be 1-2% of users and will result in making room for may be 10-20% of more subscribers. Thus increasing the user base on the contrary :)  . 
Does not mean I am in favor or capping. I am all for unlimited.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they will still have a large set of users. Don&#039;t think this move will effect more than may be 1-2% of users and will result in making room for may be 10-20% of more subscribers. Thus increasing the user base on the contrary :)  .<br />
Does not mean I am in favor or capping. I am all for unlimited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik S</title>
		<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-4365</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medianama.com/?p=2339#comment-4365</guid>
		<description>So, in a way, Airtel is saying that if we pay them extra, we can have any speed we choose. What a covert way of launching and selling their &#039;speed on demand&#039; package! Is that why the speed rationalization letter that should actually be sent by the customer service team - is signed by the Marketing Head?  
 
Did not expect Airtel - of all the ISPs to goof so horrendously. They do NOT deserve the next year&#039;s buzziest brand tag by afaqs....and this fiasco will ensure that they come nowhere near that. If Facebook can learn and bow down to users, why can&#039;t Airtel...after what is Airtel if not for a large set of users?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, in a way, Airtel is saying that if we pay them extra, we can have any speed we choose. What a covert way of launching and selling their &#039;speed on demand&#039; package! Is that why the speed rationalization letter that should actually be sent by the customer service team &#8211; is signed by the Marketing Head?  </p>
<p>Did not expect Airtel &#8211; of all the ISPs to goof so horrendously. They do NOT deserve the next year&#039;s buzziest brand tag by afaqs&#8230;.and this fiasco will ensure that they come nowhere near that. If Facebook can learn and bow down to users, why can&#039;t Airtel&#8230;after what is Airtel if not for a large set of users?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VAS Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-4362</link>
		<dc:creator>VAS Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medianama.com/?p=2339#comment-4362</guid>
		<description>In case of prepaid on mobile networks, you must be knowing that lifetime prepaid is not &quot;for lifetime&quot; instead some finite years of licenses of telecom operator. 
 
This seems like bad way of policing product&#039;s name by Indian authorities.  
 
Are they capable of understanding these issues at all ?  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case of prepaid on mobile networks, you must be knowing that lifetime prepaid is not &quot;for lifetime&quot; instead some finite years of licenses of telecom operator. </p>
<p>This seems like bad way of policing product&#039;s name by Indian authorities.  </p>
<p>Are they capable of understanding these issues at all ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopal</title>
		<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/03/223-airtel-to-moderate-user-broadband-speeds-what-of-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-4361</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medianama.com/?p=2339#comment-4361</guid>
		<description>Fine Airtel, if you want to take recourse to international norms then take recourse to all of it. Give us 2 Mbps unlimited plans at the equivalent of $10 a month. Don&#039;t throw at us stone-age era 256 kbps in the name of unlimited at $20 and then claim to adhere to international norms. A follow up question for them, perhaps. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine Airtel, if you want to take recourse to international norms then take recourse to all of it. Give us 2 Mbps unlimited plans at the equivalent of $10 a month. Don&#039;t throw at us stone-age era 256 kbps in the name of unlimited at $20 and then claim to adhere to international norms. A follow up question for them, perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
