Well, this certainly is a surprise: IOL Netcom has entered into a franchise agreement with MTNL to provide CDMA mobile services in Delhi and Mumbai. The company will introduce a mobile brand “IOL Mobile” within 90 days. IOL is targeting a user base of 1 million subscribers, and expects a rather high ARPU of over Rs. 450.
It is key to note that IOL will be offering CDMA based services – MTNL already has CDMA spectrum for offering its Wireless Local Loop (WLL) service – Garuda. Also, IOL Netcom has worked with MTNL before, on IPTV, and they intend to provide Data Card, a Desktop CDMA phone, IPTV, Broadband, VoIP and other services in the two cities.
Franchise Deal
This “Franchise” deal might just give IOL a head start over companies seeking an MVNO license in India, the guidelines for which were announced recently. A Franchise deal is essentially a workaround, given that MVNOs are still not allowed in India. This was pioneered by Virgin Mobile in India, when they tied up with Tata Teleservices to offer mobile services in India in April this year.
MTNL is limited to Delhi and Mumbai, so IOL will consequently be limited to these high-density, high ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) and high-teledensity cities, unless they also enter into a similar agreement with an operator like BSNL for other circles. Times of India Group (BCCL) also owns a 1.83 percent stake in IOL Netcom
– Smart Broadband To Launch IPTV Services With HFCL And MTNL; An HFCL Group Company?
– IPTV Gets The Government Nod; DTH, Cable FDI May Be Increased
– Time Broadband To Launch Web-On-Call Service On BSNL Networks
– Is Videocon Looking To Acquire Loss Making IPTV And VoIP Co IOL Netcom?











This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
2 Comments until now.
Does this fall into the Times Treaties Deal? I think it makes sense for companies to leverage treaties in cases like these for branding. Any opinions?
Does this 1.83% equity fall into the Times Treaties Deal? I think it makes sense for companies to leverage treaties in cases like these for branding. Any opinions?